CryptoPayIn
Comparison

CryptoPayIn vs BTCPay Server

This is the friendliest comparison on the site: BTCPay and CryptoPayIn share the same conviction — merchants shouldn't need permission to be paid. The difference is who runs the machines.

BTCPay Server is one of the great achievements of open-source Bitcoin: a self-hosted payment processor with no fees, no middleman, no KYC and full sovereignty. Money flows from your customer's wallet to yours with nobody — including us — in between. If you have the operational appetite, it is the most principled way to accept Bitcoin, and we genuinely recommend it to merchants who do.

The appetite is the catch. You are now a node operator: a server to secure and patch, hundreds of gigabytes of chain data to sync and store, Lightning channels to manage if you want fast payments, plugins for each altcoin (each with its own node), backups, monitoring, upgrades. “Free” prices your own hours at zero — accurate for hobbyists, rarely for businesses.

CryptoPayIn is the hosted expression of the same ethos: still no KYC, still your wallets as the destination, but the nodes, the watchers, the rate infrastructure, the webhooks and the uptime are our problem, across twelve assets and seven networks including Monero — for a flat 1% when you actually get paid.

Side by side

BTCPay Server vs CryptoPayIn, dimension by dimension

Competitor details reflect published pricing and policies as of July 2026 — always verify current terms with the provider.

DimensionBTCPay ServerCryptoPayIn
Platform fee0% (you host)1% flat (we host)
Real operating costServer + storage + your hours$0 fixed — fee only on settled sales
KYCNoneNone
Setup timeHours–days (node sync: up to weeks)About 30 seconds
Coins out of the boxBTC (+Lightning); altcoins via plugins & extra nodes12 assets / 7 networks, zero setup
Monero (XMR)Community plugin + your own XMR nodeFirst-class, our nodes
Fiat pricing & rate locksBasic rate sources, self-managed30 fiat currencies, dual-lock, fail-closed verification
Uptime & maintenanceYoursOurs
Choose BTCPay Server if…

You have real devops capacity, want absolute sovereignty with zero custodial exposure, primarily need Bitcoin (perhaps with Lightning), and enjoy running infrastructure.

Choose CryptoPayIn if…
Recommended for most

You want the no-KYC ethos with none of the ops: twelve coins today, hosted checkout, signed webhooks, independent rate verification and support — for 1% only when you're actually paid.

Create your account →
FAQ

BTCPay Server switchers ask

Isn't 0% obviously better than 1%?

Only if your time is free and your uptime doesn't matter. A VPS, chain storage, monitoring and the hours to maintain multi-coin nodes typically exceed 1% of small-merchant volume many times over. At very large volume, self-hosting can win — we say so plainly.

Is BTCPay more private than CryptoPayIn?

BTCPay is fully sovereign — nothing touches a third party, which is maximal. CryptoPayIn holds no identity and settles to your wallets, which is the closest a hosted service gets. Sovereignty vs convenience is the real axis.

Can I run both?

A surprisingly common setup: BTCPay for Bitcoin/Lightning sovereignty, CryptoPayIn for the other eleven assets, fiat-priced invoices and set-and-forget uptime. Nothing about either excludes the other.

What about Lightning support?

BTCPay with a Lightning node is superb for instant sub-cent BTC payments — genuinely ahead of us there. Our fast lanes today are Solana (~seconds) and Tron (~1 minute), with no channels to manage.

The switch takes one afternoon.

One endpoint, one webhook, no KYC and a flat 1% fee. Your first invoice can settle today.